European Commission Nixes Across-the-Board Member Country Online Gambling Synchronicity, Mirroring States’ Rights Dilemmas

Europea<span id="more-8094"></span>n Commission Nixes Across-the-Board Member Country Online Gambling Synchronicity, Mirroring States’ Rights Dilemmas

The European Commission’s Harrie Temmink, who told ICE the other day that EU-wide online gambling legislation would perhaps not take place in his life time ‘or the next.’

The European Commission (EC) has abandoned the idea of a pan-European framework that is regulatory online gambling, accepting that each member states mainly oppose synchronizing their Internet video gaming laws. The move interestingly mirrors similar dilemmas in the usa, where states’ rights vs. federal dictates have grown to be a battle that is ongoing the iGaming wars.

Speaking at last week’s International Casino Exhibition in London (ICE), Harrie Temmink told the industry emphatically that the EC wasn’t taking care of sector-specific legislation in gambling.

‘The Commission is not proposing it and will perhaps not propose it,’ he said. ‘Not in my life time or the following.’

Temmink leads the gambling team unit and chairs the EC’s Professional Group on Gambling Services.

This may be a far cry from the EC’s previous stance. In 2011, Internal Market and Services Commissioner Michel Barnier proposed a framework that is eu-wide to protecting consumers and citizens, preventing fraudulence, and maintaining the integrity of activities.

EU Action Plan

Barnier’s view at that time was that ‘the prevailing regulatory, societal and[online that is technical] issues in the EU’ could never be ‘tackled adequately by member states individually.’

‘This is especially true given the cross-border measurement of on line gambling,’ he said in 2012, when it had been announced that the EC would prepare an ‘action plan’ to clarify the regulation of the sector and encourage cooperation between member states.

The EC frowned regarding the regulatory actions which had been taken in France, Italy, and Spain, which saw those markets ring-fenced and operators taxed at a higher rate, in obvious conflict with EU ideals of free motion of services between member states.

Barnier’s plan ended up beingn’t proposing a single EU licensing regime, but rather had the goal of ensuring that member states adopted its vision for an even more liberal regulatory landscape across Europe. User states that refused to play ball would then be sanctioned, in Barnier’s vision.

But Barnier left the post in 2014, and their successor, Günther Oettinger, seems less zealous about pushing the cause and more resigned to leaving regulation to specific jurisdictions.

More Fragmented than Ever

As Temmink explained, ‘I can assure you that whenever we proposed legislation on gambling, in the first conference with the Council, we would have 26 away from 28 member states that will be fiercely opposed to the proposition.

‘It will be committing suicide,’ he added.

Since Barnier outlined their plan in 2012, a wave of new legislation has spread across European countries, and many licensing that is new have sprung up, through the UK to Portugal. Europe has become also less coordinated regarding the front that is iGaming plus the fragmented regulatory landscape proves a greater challenge to operators than ever.

‘Operators need to truly have a license for the specific country in that they offer games, without being able to count on the recognition of licenses between one European country and another,’ said Temmink. ‘For their part is for the Member States to make sure a system that is non-discriminatory of licenses.’

Nevada Voters Courted by Hillary Clinton and Bernie Sanders, Democratic Caucus Is Key

Bernie Sanders and Hillary Clinton are focused on reaching as many Nevada voters as possible before the Silver State caucuses on Feb. 23rd in what is shaping up to become a make-or-break point in the campaign that is democratic. (Image: Jim Young/Reuters)

Nevada voters are the center of attention for both Hillary Clinton and Bernie Sanders’ campaigns appropriate now, as the two Democratic presidential nominees try to persuade as numerous last-minute voters to vote for them before this week’s February 23rd caucus.

The Silver State had long been thought to be her roadblock to stop any Bernie Sanders momentum after Clinton’s narrow victory in Iowa, followed by a hefty defeat in New Hampshire. She once held a nearly 50-point lead over her challengers, but Sanders’ grassroots movement has severely tightened the race, with numerous analysts now believing Nevada is up for grabs.

Clinton and Sanders each spent the week-end making stops around the state. Sanders campaigned in Reno on Saturday, then Las vegas, nevada on Sunday, while his opponent met with voters in several areas round the gaming mecca throughout the weekend.

The two Democrats concluded the weekend on Sunday at the Victory Missionary Baptist Church in Las Vegas, a congregation largely made up of African-Americans.

‘Whenever we can win here in Nevada, we send a profound message to the complete country, and that message is the fact that folks of this country will no further accept establishment politics,’ Sanders said during his brief remarks.

Clinton responded to Sanders with a relative line as vague as Bernie’s plan of just how he will fund his utopian vision.

‘I am maybe not a single issue candidate,’ Clinton said. ‘ Because if we had been going to produce everything about banks and money and politics, would that end racism?’

Say what now?

Nevada Key State in Runoff

When Sanders officially announced their decision to operate for the presidency in May, the so-called ‘Clinton machine’ was currently planning to work in Nevada. Volunteers were making hundreds of daily calls, going door-to-door, and obtaining endorsements from key state and local leaders.

The Vermont senator didn’t have much of an opportunity, at least according to pundits that are political.

Fast-forward nine months, and Clinton just canceled an event in Florida this to stay the course in Nevada and shake every hand, ascend each stage, and grasp every microphone she can before Nevadans head to caucus on Saturday week.

Nevada has a long history of being a swing state within the general presidential election, and its constituents have actually a nearly perfect record of voting for the ultimate winner. Since 1912, Nevada has correctly picked the president that is next except for in 1976, when Nevada visited Gerald Ford over Jimmy Carter.

A win in Nevada for Clinton will be expected, while a victory for Sanders pull off exactly what would perhaps function as the biggest political upset in modern history.

Neck-in-Neck towards the Finish

Nevada houses the gambling epicenter of the United States, therefore possibly it’s appropriate there is small statistical evidence to run on in determining which candidate will win on Saturday.

The stark reality is that betting on Clinton or Sanders is equivalent to betting on black or red. The most poll that is recent TargetPoint, the very first political data on the competition since late December, has Clinton and Sanders tied 45-45.

Scalia Death Further Stirs the Pot

Including to the intensity of it all, Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia passed away on Saturday in Texas of apparent natural factors at the chronilogical age of 79. Appointed to your work bench by President Reagan in 1986, the consistently conservative judge’s death leaves a vacancy on the highest court that is already causing more political divide between Republicans and Democrats.

A number of names have been tossed around, including current Nevada Governor Brian Sandoval (R). A welcomed compromise to both conservative and liberal congressional leaders though Sandoval’s GOP label might make him seem unlikely for an Obama endorsement, his pro-choice and pro-immigration views could make the first Silver State governor of Hispanic heritage.

Nevada Gaming Regulator Michonne Ascuaga Resigns Over Alleged Sparks Nugget Improprieties

Michonne Ascuaga, who has resigned through the Nevada Gaming Commission in the wake of the news that a property she previously managed with her household, the Sparks Nugget in north Nevada, is being examined for lax anti-money controls that are laundering. (Image:

Michonne Ascuaga has resigned from her post on the Nevada Gaming Commission, following the revelation of alleged financial improprieties at the Sparks Nugget, the casino in northern Nevada that she managed for 16 years.

The Nugget has been examined by the U 888 casino taiwan.S. Department of Treasury’s Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN) over allegations it did not comply with financial laws during Ascuaga’s tenure, and neglected to ascertain an effective anti-money laundering program.

The investigation found light in a court filing week that is last as section of a longstanding contractual lawsuit brought by the Ascuaga household from the casino’s new owners, Wolfhound Holdings, the private investment group that bought the property in 2013.

Sandoval Unaware of Investigation

A spokeswoman for Nevada Governor Brian Sandoval said that Sandoval had been unaware of the investigation whenever he appointed Ascuaga to your Gaming Commission panel last April.

‘Michonne Ascuaga has served the Nevada Gaming Commission well,’ composed Brian Sandoval in accepting the resignation. ‘I admire her and desire to recognize her family’s long history as leaders within the gaming industry.

‘I appreciate that she has put the credibility and reputation associated with Gaming Commission first,’ he added. ‘Michonne is a consummate professional and will continue to be a frontrunner in our community.’

Ascuaga has claimed within an statement that is official she ‘did not purposely hold back information from the governor.’

‘The Sparks Nugget ended up being informed in November 2013 by the Department of Treasury that the Department ended up being investigating whether it was appropriate to impose civil penalties for feasible violations of anti-money laundering regulations,’ she added. ‘The matter arose from an examination that is audit-type by the IRS at the casino in 2010. This was all disclosed immediately to the buyer.’

Ascuaga Lawsuit

It is alleged that the Nugget will be investigated for laxity in its record-keeping and reporting requirements. By law, all businesses must file a Currency Transaction Report on all deals over $10,000, and report any activity that is suspicious FinCEN, as a means of guarding against money-laundering.

Ascuaga may be the daughter of John L. Ascuaga, the son of the Basque shepherd who owned the Nugget for over 50 years before its sale to Wolfhound. The Ascuaga family members believes it’s still owed $500,000 beneath the sale and purchase agreement of the Nugget.

Ascuaga said she was resigning ‘out of deep respect for the Nevada Gaming Commission also to not allow myself to become an unnecessary distraction from the essential regulatory oversight work it does.’

Schreibe einen Kommentar

Deine E-Mail-Adresse wird nicht veröffentlicht. Erforderliche Felder sind mit * markiert.